From something I edited:
"In the February, 2007, edition of the New York Times..."
The writer had the right idea, sort of. If you are doing a full date (for example, February 14, 2009), then you do need the commas around the year:
"In the February 14, 2009, edition of the New York Times..."
You're enclosing the 2009 within commas. Commas often go in pairs. Only one comma is lonely and incorrect:
"In the February 14, 2009 edition of the New York Times..."
If you don't have the date with the month, then you don't need commas:
"In the February 2007 edition of the New York Times..."
Ask Me a Question
If you have a writing, grammar, style or punctuation question, send an e-mail message to curiouscase at sign hotmail dot com.
Add Your Own Criminal Sentence!
If you find a particularly terrible sentence somewhere, post it for all to see (go here and put it in the Comments section).
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
I think the phrase should read "in a February 2007 edition of the New York Times" (for this particular case) since the New York Times is a daily publication, not monthly. (Unless, of course, I'm wrong.)
Of course you're right and I'm not perfect. Waaaaaaah!
Post a Comment